Pentagon leaders plan secret meetings about Trump orders
Listen To Story Above
Recent reports from CNN indicate Pentagon officials have conducted meetings to strategize their response to potential orders from Donald Trump’s anticipated second term. These discussions specifically address how to handle directives regarding domestic troop deployment and personnel changes.
This development follows a pattern of tension between military leadership and Trump. During his previous presidency, concerns arose regarding the events of January 6, 2021. Trump had requested National Guard presence at the Capitol, specifically stating, “Hey, look at this. There’s going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th. Make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it’s a safe event.”
Breaking: CNN Reports The Pentagon Is Meeting In Secret To Plot Against Trump
For Breaking News And Reports Go Here:https://t.co/n6SlDavbf0 pic.twitter.com/LAOGcEQweA
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) November 10, 2024
Former Joint Chiefs Chairman General Mark Milley’s actions during this period proved controversial. Beyond disregarding Trump’s National Guard request, Milley allegedly assumed control of military operations post-January 6. Additionally, he maintained unauthorized communication with Chinese officials, promising advance warning of potential U.S. actions against China.
According to CNN, defense officials are now preparing for various scenarios, with one official stating, “We are all preparing and planning for the worst-case scenario, but the reality is that we don’t know how this is going to play out yet.”
The relationship between Trump and military leadership remains strained, with the former president criticizing generals as “woke,” “weak” and “ineffective leaders.” These preparations by Pentagon officials reflect ongoing concerns about potential administrative changes under a second Trump presidency.
These discussions have emerged against the backdrop of historical context, where Trump stands as the only president in four decades who didn’t initiate new military conflicts during his term. The same military leadership that oversaw the controversial withdrawal from Afghanistan, including the abandonment of Bagram Air Force Base and substantial military equipment, is now contemplating responses to potential future presidential directives.