
Presidents Have Strong Legal Power to Set Tariffs
Listen To Story Above
A president’s authority to impose tariffs and trade restrictions stems from multiple legislative acts passed by Congress over many decades. These laws explicitly delegate significant power to the executive branch in matters of international trade and national security.
The Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 provide the president extensive authority to regulate commerce during times of war or national emergency. Additionally, Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 allows the president to adjust imports that threaten national security.
Even Trump’s controversial use of Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose tariffs on China was upheld by the Court of International Trade. This precedent strongly suggests that his current actions regarding Mexico would likely survive legal challenges.
The Constitution itself grants Congress primary authority over international trade and tariffs. However, Congress has consistently chosen to delegate substantial portions of this power to the executive branch through various pieces of legislation over the past century.
All President's have done Tarrifs.
Is It Legal for Trump to Impose Tariffs? https://t.co/w3Um8C0VWh
— Republic (@FreedomLost88) February 3, 2025
Critics may debate the wisdom of these delegations of power, but their legality is well-established. Multiple Supreme Court decisions have affirmed Congress’s ability to grant the president such authority, provided there are some basic guidelines and limitations in place.
While reasonable people can disagree on whether any particular tariff is good policy, the legal foundation for presidential action in this area is solid. The various statutes passed by Congress create a clear framework within which presidents can act to address perceived threats to national security or unfair trade practices.